Effective Peer Feedback Through Modeling: Part 1

Peer review has long been regarded as beneficial practice in the teaching of writing.  In North American educational settings, learners are often asked to provide feedback on each other’s papers.  However, when international students come to study either in intensive English programs or in institutions of higher education, they may encounter difficulties during peer review activities because many of them never had experiences with this kind of practice.  As a result, students tend to give each other broad, irrelevant, essentially unhelpful comments.

This may be part of the reason that second language writers sometimes don’t take peer review activities seriously and/or disregard classmates’ feedback.  Therefore, it is important that writing teachers equip students with the knowledge on how to provide helpful comments on each other’s drafts.

Modeling is one of the most effective pedagogical tools in teaching a foreign language, and we can certainly use it to teach learners how to give useful feedback.  I would like to share two modeling activities that I implement in my writing classes to help students become more effective peer reviewers. In today’s blog, I will describe the first activity—which will teach students to thoroughly analyze someone else’s draft.  In my next blog, I will share the second activity, which will focus on providing effective comments.

Activity 1: The Analysis Chart

  1. For this activity, you need to prepare a sample essay.  You can also use one of your students’ drafts if they are comfortable with that.  In some classes that I’ve taught, students didn’t mind me displaying their drafts for the purpose of teaching a particular principle or giving an example.
  2. Display the essay on the projector or give students paper copies.  Whether or not I use a projector, I prepare paper copies for students, anyway, so they can take notes, highlight, underline, or comment if needed.
  3. Draw a three-column chart on the board.  The first column is entitled “Strengths” or “What the author did well,” the second one is called “Weaknesses” or “What the author didn’t do so well,” and the title of the third column is “Changes to be made” or “What the author needs to improve.”
  4. Read the first paragraph and analyze it together with the students.  Help them see the strengths of the paragraph.  Many times, students have a hard time finding specific positive features of someone else’s writing, and they end up making general comments such as “It’s nice!” or “Good job!”.  So help them see why this particular paragraph you are analyzing is “nice” or how the author did “a good job.” (Perhaps the paragraph has a sufficient number of supporting details, or the author uses a good variety of academic vocabulary, or the writing demonstrates a good command of grammar.)  Write down these strengths in the first column.
  5. Continuing with the same paragraph, point out some of the weaknesses that the paragraph may have (or you can find them together with the students).  Perhaps the paragraph displays lack of unity or syntactic variety, or the author did not provide specific or clear examples, or the paragraph lacks coherence.  Write down these “weaknesses” in the second column of the chart.
  6. Still staying in the same paragraph, discuss with the students some of the improvements that the author needs to make in this paragraph.  Share with the students some of your recommendations but also ask them what they think needs to be revised to make this paragraph more effective.  Write down these ideas in the third column.
  7. Repeat the same procedure for the second paragraph.
  8. You can continue modeling this analysis for the rest of the essay, or you can put students in small groups and have them finish the activity on their own.

I usually encourage students to do a similar analysis with their own drafts.  Most students find it very effective as they work on revisions of their drafts.  As far as peer review goes, they learn how to notice both strong features of someone else’s writing and parts that need to be revised.  Accordingly, students learn not only to make comments that contain recommendations or suggestions for improvement, but also provide feedback that points out a writer’s strengths.

My next blog will describe an activity that you can do to help students provide effective feedback on each other’s writing.

About Elena Shvidko

Elena Shvidko
Elena Shvidko is originally from Russia and has been in the United States for 7 years pursuing her education, most recently her doctorate in second language studies at Purdue University. Elena received her master's in TESOL from Brigham Young University and has taught various ESL classes both in academic and community settings. Currently, she is an instructor of first-year composition courses in the English department at Purdue University.
This entry was posted in TESOL Blog and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Effective Peer Feedback Through Modeling: Part 1

  1. Thank you Elena for your article. I agree with the idea of peer writing among the students. I beleive it is a good idea when we give students the freedom to depend on themselves and work collaboratively. Students will have the chance to learn different techniques applied by their friends and they will also avoid the mistakes their classmates made. They can also do peer writing using their blogs and wikies if possible.

  2. Nancy says:

    Elena, I love using peer review of writing assignments in my class. One thing I often do is to have students peer review several students’ writing in groups and their notes with their individual signature are then attached to the original writing. This allows different perspectives presented to the original writer! As the notes are all signed, more clarifications could be pursued. When clear rubrics are given to students beforehand, it works even better! Students seem to learn quite a lot from each other!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>